rant time! i don’t rant enough. or maybe i do, but they’re dispersed amongst any number of websites through my pithy commentary. oh look…a new social network has emerged. and from google no less. and while i am all for early adoption of new media, it’s not because i’m forward thinking or anything…its really because i like to reserve my names and handles early on. though in the case of google+, it’s tied to my gmail name anyway. *shrug* oh well.
so now i’m on google+, and some friends find it less than exciting, others already pointing at the death of facebook. which got me wondering…huh? let’s backtrack a bit. before google+, there was a discernible chorus of people complaining about facebooks privacy issues, etc…and that they would like to bail on it for really…anything like facebook, but not facebook. which had me wondering a bit to myself. what the fuck were people posting on facebook that was soooo important as to be deemed ‘top secret…don’t steal my info brah‘. the fact that you were drunk last night? your shit stain looked like jesus? you like nyancats? oh fuck…they’re on to you! if you added your email, phone number, etc…then that’s on you. but really…what then? nobody cried when phone books were delivered in the past. the point is, nobody gives a fuck about you. there is no secret department within facebook noting every minutiae of your life via your profile and news feed. and even if there were, their weekly reports would be something along the lines of “watches shitty movies, likes reality tv, gets drunk alot.” but let’s get this straight…if you had issues with fb’s privacy issues, oh yes, google would be a much better place. the company that knows everything about you already. yea the perfect alternative.
i continued wondering some more…about modern society’s need to clearly define the new and the obsolete. that if they’re not rebuilding the shrine every 20 years, that they become irrelevant. this topic of course extends beyond just social networks (for instance dumbasses buying a new iphone every year), but with social networks, it worked a bit differently. do people really love rebuilding their profile and friends list every few years? because i sure as fuck don’t. it was first friendster, then myspace, then facebook, and now google+. while i’m all for keeping up with the progression of technology and bemoan those that refuse to adopt, in this particular case it wasn’t about a technological progression. friendster was a first step, myspace was eyeball herpes…but facebook had everything most need and expect from a social network. the facebook newsfeed is their crowning achievement and gift to social networks everywhere. google+ brings circles. yea, taking bets how long before facebook brings out a similar update. what else? not much.
the point of this rant isn’t to say i wont be on google+, since i am. it’s to question the necessity of another social network, and as a corollary, people’s oddly misguided malignment of facebook when they clearly want what they offer. from google’s perspective, of course another network…their network…is necessary. but from a user standpoint, it seems kind of pointless.